Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selesnya Beanstalk | mj_23 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Golgari Midrange | skeptic2304 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Selesnya Gearhulk | kram1138 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Golgari Midrange | isael | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Golgari Midrange | nandisko | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Roots , Bant Enchantments , Bant Gearhulk , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Elves , Golgari Beanstalk
Meta Performance Analysis
Llanowar Elves ranks #66 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 21%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 57.8%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Llanowar Elves is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 30.13 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.3%. Llanowar Elves has a win rate of 65.9%, making it 7.6% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phyrexian Censor | Creature — Phyrexian Wizard | 9 | 78.3% | 5 |
| Leyline Axe | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 75.0% | 2 |
| Skrelv, Defector Mite | Legendary Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Mite | 15 | 71.3% | 6 |
| Scrollshift | Instant | 6 | 70.6% | 3 |
| Tolsimir, Midnight's Light | Legendary Creature — Elf Scout | 11 | 69.4% | 4 |
| Sunder the Gateway | Sorcery | 7 | 67.6% | 3 |
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 41 | 66.8% | 16 |
| Vinereap Mentor | Creature — Squirrel Druid | 6 | 63.9% | 2 |
| The Huntsman's Redemption | Enchantment — Saga | 6 | 63.1% | 2 |
| Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 5 | 62.9% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Llanowar Elves than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 4 | 5 | 76.2% | 67.1% | +9.1% |
| Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 1 | 5 | 72.2% | 68.5% | +3.7% |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 4 | 14 | 72.7% | 69.1% | +3.6% |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 16 | 70.4% | 68.0% | +2.4% |
| Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 8 | 15 | 70.6% | 68.4% | +2.1% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 21 | 69.5% | 68.0% | +1.4% |
| Choking Miasma | Sorcery | 3 | 13 | 67.5% | 66.4% | +1.1% |
| Debris Beetle | Artifact — Vehicle | 4 | 6 | 64.7% | 63.7% | +1.0% |
| Maelstrom Pulse | Sorcery | 3 | 26 | 66.0% | 66.3% | -0.2% |
| Harvester of Misery | Creature — Spirit | 5 | 26 | 67.1% | 67.5% | -0.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | 587 | 76.9% | 44.8% |
| Golgari Demons | 475 | 87.2% | 47.8% |
| Selesnya Cage | 250 | 100.0% | 48.7% |
| Unknown Archetype | 31 | 9.9% | 35.0% |
| Unclassified | 27 | 13.3% | 24.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.